Tuesday, March 29, 2016
Voices of conscience in the Middle East: Raif Badawi
Sunday, January 24, 2016
Back on the writing track
Wednesday, August 29, 2012
Foreign policy news on Tumblr?
However, with a lot of inspiration,Tumblr could be used as well for foreign policy news and blogging. An example is the new blog of the International Relations and Security Network - ISN ETH Zurich that launched recently a new online media tool. It is an elegant and appealing presence, pleasant to read and with a very interesting content.
Friday, October 15, 2010
Help Solve the Global Water Crisis with Social Media
Monday, January 25, 2010
Reloading
Monday, September 14, 2009
OSCE media freedom representative calls on Azerbaijan to improve media freedom, hopes detained bloggers may be released soon
Friday, August 14, 2009
Blogs grow up
Saturday, June 20, 2009
The state of art
Thursday, April 23, 2009
The Political Perils Of The Internet
‘Have you ever sent an email that could embarrass the President?’ is one of the questions asked as part of the confirmation procedure for the thousands of applicants to join the Obama Administration.
The question is generally taken as evidence of the near-impossible height to which Obama has raised the bar for people who want to work for him.
One reason why many well qualified individuals are reluctant to go into public service and why more than half of the jobs in the Administration remain unfilled.
But the Administration’s precautions also betray a sensitivity to the dangers of the internet which Derek Draper and Damian McBride would have been well advised to respect.
The “Red Rag” affair is a story of the internet about the internet and broken on the internet by Guido Fawkes (even if Paul Staines, Guido’s alter ego, did call in back-up from the dead tree press to give his scoop critical heft).
The internet has changed the rules for people in public life in two significant respects.
Firstly emails leave a trail of written evidence far more accessible to exposure than any paper trail or series of phone calls. Secondly, the blogosphere and websites offer the public quicker and easier access to potentially damaging revelations and allegations.
Long before his abortive foray into blogging, Damian McBride’s flaming emails were legendary around Westminster.
The Sunday Times reported on one he sent to me, claiming that the ex-cabinet Minister Stephen Byers could not be considered a legitimate spokesman for the Labour party.
A number of sites, including Iain Dale, Coffee House, ConservativeHome and, yes, Boulton & Co, have broken stories online. But in Britain Guido Fawkes' ‘Order Order’ has set the pace for scoops that have been politically significant.
Mr Staines says he is anti-government rather than anti-Labour, and it’s certainly the government which has had the worst from a right-of-centre anarcho-libertarian perspective he has forced resignations or enforced self criticism from the likes of Peter Hain, the John Smith Institute and now the Prime Minister’s private office.
In the US sites such as Politico, Huffington Post, The Daily Beast, The Page, and Drudge Report have become instant sources of information which bypass the print media and traditional broadcasters.
Obama’s comments about clinging to guns and religion were broken by Huffington – whose White House correspondent was given a question at President Obama’s first news conference. From Sarah Palin’s family to the Obama’s new dog web sites were the first source of information.
Meanwhile in America newspapers are closing, laying workers off and cutting back. Established news organisations increasingly see the internet as the main place to grow revenue, although it remains to be seen if the hopes of the likes of AP and the Wall Street Journal of charging more for content will work.
Increasingly large organizations see websites as the way to disseminate printed information, and increasingly pictures and video, about themselves on their own terms – just look at the 10 Downing Street or White House Websites.
But from TV networks to the top of politics, there’s a nagging anxiety that established organizations are too staid, too inflexible, too old fashioned to compete effectively in the world of Google, Youtube and Facebook.
This neurosis is particularly severe for New Labour which had always prided itself with being at the cutting edge of communications. The door of Number Ten was wide open to an over-confident self-proclaimed expert such as Mr Draper.
The moral of this story is to do what you do best. Politicians, let alone governments and political parties are not journalist, media organisations, or lone gun campaigners, and are ill advised to try to be so. It will end in tears.
At Sky News we believe we have the skills, the news gathering resources and the reputation to make a big useful contribution on line.
With millions of websites out there – we think there’s still a big need for websites you like and trust.
Essentially we are providing the journalism we have always offered in new formats. I expect that other news organisations would say the same kind of thing.
That doesn’t mean we will become Guido Fawkes, even if we are sometimes competing with him. But the point about Mr Fawkes is that he understands what he is trying to do and is putting his heart and soul into it.
Political blogging is not just a matter of thinking up a few smears and sending them out on email.
Cuban blogger talks about citizen journalism project and 'blogostroika'
Yoanie Sanchez, Cuba's star blogger, has elaborated a little more about the citizen journalism project she launched on the island in January in an attempt to challenge media censorship there.
Sanchez, who is the author of the blog Generación Y, started the Voces Cubanas (Cuban Voices) blogging platform to gather citizen journalists from across the island, according to the Knight Center for Journalism's Journalism in the Americas blog.
Global Voices' Claudia Cadelo interviews Sánchez about the project, which she says is different from Generación Y and the existing Desde Cuba.
She says in the interview: "It is a website where all those who want to express ideas, put their projects online, can do so. It is born and inspired by the experience that we gained through the administration of other sites, but there is not an editorial policy that guides it, rather each blogger is his or her own director, editor and even censor."
Sanchez also talks about the concept of "blogostróika," the name used by many for the blogging movement in Cuba.
-- Deborah Bonello in Mexico City
Thursday, February 26, 2009
Facebook Diplomacy
Washington wants to use the Web 2.0 to win hearts and minds. Trouble is, the tyrants got there first.
Barack Obama came to the White House on a wave of Internet support, so it makes sense that he plans to use the same vehicle as a tool of diplomacy. His secretary of state, Hillary Clinton, said as much earlier this month. "There is no doubt in my mind that we've barely scratched the surface as to what we can use to communicate with people around the world," she said at a Feb. 4 meeting in Washington, D.C. "We are, in my view, wasting time, wasting money, wasting opportunities, because we are not prepared to communicate effectively with what is out there in the business world and the private world."
Clinton is right to be enthusiastic about Web 2.0 tools. They offer the promise of promoting democracy in countries that currently give the United States big geopolitical headaches—particularly Iran, China and Russia. But it's not going to be easy. Tehran, Beijing and Moscow already have a presence on the Internet and in recent months have stepped up their campaigns to manipulate public opinion at home.
The kind of outreach that Clinton is emphasizing can have a significant payoff. At the height of the war in Gaza, Israel's Immigrant Absorption Ministry waged a campaign to recruit an "army of bloggers" made up of polyglot Israelis who could counter anti-Israel sentiment on English, German, Spanish, Portuguese, Russian and French sites. According to reports in Haaretz, after having registered with the ministry, the volunteers were directed to sites that authorities found "problematic." Volunteers could even sign up for automated alerts urging collective action in reaction to specific articles and polls.
If the U.S. government takes a similar path, it's only logical to assume that the nations it targets will take steps to counter the intervention. American leaders may think that the millions of Russians, Chinese and Iranians who have been heading online in recent years are seeking Western points of view, but their governments are by now well practiced at turning this tendency to their advantage.
Russian President Dmitry Medvedev has said that his administration is not going to censor the Internet, but that may be because it has found something more effective: spinning it. The Kremlin uses a private firm, New Media Stars, founded by Konstantyn Rykov, a 29-year-old Duma deputy. Rykov's new media empire includes online news sites, a site for supporters of Vladimir Putin (zaputina.ru—"For Putin!"), online games and an Internet TV channel with a pro-Kremlin bent. Navigating these mazes of propaganda and trying to plant effective pro-American messages would be difficult even for a Web-savvy State Department.
In China, both national and local authorities have begun to encourage loose networks of ordinary Netizens to promote government ideology by identifying and countering dissenting opinions on the Web. The practice is so widespread that government-supported commentators are referred to as the "50 cent party" (for the tiny payments some of them receive for their work). Hong Kong's Apple Daily puts the membership of the 50 cent party at 280,000. Under particular pressure are popular Internet portals and news Web sites. According to David Bandurski, a media researcher at the University of Hong Kong, the most important of them are also required to hire their own in-house commentators to counter antigovernment comments that citizens append to articles.
Iran's clerics have also climbed the cyber-learning curve. When the Internet began to catch on earlier this decade, religious teachers tried to supervise the online activities of their young students and promote the use of the Internet mainly for religious study. As access became widespread, this method became untenable. More recently, Iranian cyberspace has begun to mirror the complexity of contemporary Iranian politics, with different factions—religious, paramilitary and secular—competing for influence. To keep up, government and religious institutions have employed armies of bloggers to push their points of view. (The most recent chapter in these information wars is a decision by one of the units of the infamous Iranian Revolutionary Guards to launch 10,000 blogs to counter both secular and competing Shia voices.) The result is a cacophony of warring religious factions. John Kelly, an expert in the Iranian blogosphere at Harvard's Berkman Center, has found that in the last year, the proportion of religious sites among the top 5,000 most-linked Iranian blogs has grown from 16 percent to 31 percent.
What does this mean to the future of Diplomacy 2.0? That so many governments manipulate the Internet to their advantage—all the while still practicing old-fashioned tactics like throwing bloggers in jail—suggests that those who hoped to use cyberspace to promote democracy and American ideals on the cheap may be in for a tough fight. If anything, the Internet may make their jobs harder.
See also:
Ha'aretz - The Army of blogging, word for word
