Showing posts with label Israel Defense Forces. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Israel Defense Forces. Show all posts

Tuesday, June 1, 2010

Flotillas and the war on public opinion

a Stratfor analysis about the situation in the Middle East. I watched carefully the news and footages during the events, as well as the reports from the international media.
There are still many events on the run - including the Arab League meeting from today, with impressive pressures against Egypt to give up being part of the blockade against Hamas.
The distance between the facts and their interpretation is huge. And, from many point of view, the communication plan was a failure. There are military regulations and not all the information could be released instantly to the public. Meanwhile, the volume and frequence of communication from the other side of the story was amazing. Millions of people - including with fake IDs and accounts - were involved with actions of supports all over the web - on Facebook, Twitter, comments to foreign media. In this case, despite the facts, the result is an increased condemnation of the state of Israel. And, in Sderot, the missiles continued.
Was it an intelligence failure or of an evaluation failure? I am asking why the negative perception of Israel in the media, increased significantly in the last years, is not still considered a fact you have to work on. Maybe hasbara should be redesigned according to the realities and not relying on situations no longer available.

Monday, May 31, 2010

Destination Gaza

Here is the conversation between the "peace" navy and the Israeli authorities. There are procedures already in place - as the aid was usually delivered via Ashdod. Everybody was aware and warned about the situation. The answer: "Destination Gaza".


Sunday, May 30, 2010

Israel MFA Legal Expert on Gaza


It is a regular procedure and there are rules to be respected. "Gaza is no more under Israeli control" - so, what do they want to "free"? But, it is a state of conflict and attacks against civilians. Blockade is a legitimate tool used in the international law. Under international humanitarian law, Israel is having the obligation to supply the humanitarian good and medicine.

Thursday, May 20, 2010

Israel launches overnight air raids on Gaza

AFP


GAZA CITY — The Israeli military launched aerial raids overnight in the Hamas-ruled Gaza Strip, but no one was injured or killed in the sorties, witnesses and officials said Friday.

Israeli officials said the three raids, targeting a residential area in the north of the Palestinian enclave and two in the south, were in response to an earlier missile attack by Palestinian militants.

"Our planes attacked terrorist installations in the north of the region and two tunnels located in the south which could serve for attacks against Israel," an Israeli defence spokesman said, confirming the raids.

On Thursday evening, "a rocket fired from the north of the Gaza Strip fell in the Ashkelon region without causing any injuries," south of Tel Aviv, the spokesman told AFP.

The Ansar al Sunna group claimed responsibility for the attack, in a statement.

Israel launched a devastating assault on the Hamas-run Gaza Strip in December 2008 aimed at halting rocket fire. Some 1,400 Palestinians and 13 Israelis were killed in the 22-day war.

Saturday, March 28, 2009

The War Over Gaza Continues Online


INSERT DESCRIPTIONA screenshot of an image of Cpl. Adi Rodnitzki, recently crowned Miss Israel 2009, used on the Web site of the Israel Defense Forces.

As we noted in January, the English and Hebrew versions of the Israeli military’s official Web site seem to present slightly different messages about the Israel Defense Forces to domestic and foreign audiences.

A look at the two versions of the site today shows that the series of rotating images across the top of the site’s English home page still starts with seven straight images of female soldiers, while the parallel Hebrew version starts with images of male soldiers, with only one photograph of female soldiers among the first seven. The only significant change that seems to have been made to this part of the site since January, when the Israeli newspaper Haaretz followed up on our post, is that the banner slide show for Hebrew readers no longer begins with an image of a male soldier wearing a prayer shawl and phylacteries.

On Monday, the Danger Room blog at Wired suggested that the I.D.F.’s Web team may have chosen to feature a profile of Cpl. Adi Rodnitzki — headlined “Israel Navy’s Beauty Queen” — on the site this week in order to deflect some attention away from a raft of recent reports in the domestic and foreign press that have raised questions about the actions of Israeli soldiers during the recent offensive in Gaza.

In fact, since Ms. Rodnitzki was named Miss Israel just last week, it is hardly surprising that the military’s Web site would report on her success — especially given that, as the site notes, she “serves as the secretary of the head of Foreign Relations, whose job it is to present the Navy to the world.”

The site also gives greater play to two other articles that seem intended to rebut the recent criticism of the Gaza war. A report on remarks by the Chief of the General Staff, Lt. Gen. Gabi Ashkenazi, is headlined “The IDF is one of the world’s most moral militaries.” Another, on the results of an internal study of Israel’s bombardment of Gaza, is headlined “99 Percent of Aerial Attacks Hit Target Precisely.”

Elsewhere on the Web, activists and human rights groups are linking to an article and three video reports published by the British newspaper The Guardian on Tuesday. The paper’s report, which it says is the product of a month of reporting, tells the stories of Palestinians in Gaza who claim to have witnessed war crimes being committed during the Israeli offensive. Julian Borger and Clancy Chassay write that the charge made in the first video report, that the Israeli military used Palestinian civilians as human shields, is sure to be controversial, given the heated condemnations leveled by some supporters of Israel at Hamas fighters for doing exactly that during the fighting. As Mr. Borger and Mr. Chassay write:

Some of the most dramatic testimony gathered by The Guardian came from three teenage brothers in the al-Attar family. They describe how they were taken from home at gunpoint, made to kneel in front of Israeli tanks to deter Hamas fighters from firing, and sent by Israeli soldiers into Palestinian houses to clear them. “They would make us go first so if any fighters shot at them the bullets would hit us, not them,” 14-year-old Al’a al-Attar said.

In the other two video reports, The Guardian claims to have documented “the targeting of medics and hospitals,” and “obtained evidence of civilians being hit by fire from unmanned drone aircraft said to be so accurate that their operators can tell the color of the clothes worn by a target.”

Meanwhile, activists on the Israeli left continue to press their campaign online to end the Israeli blockade of Gaza. Earlier this month, an Israeli human rights group called Gisha, whose goal, according to a statement on its Web site, “is to protect the freedom of movement of Palestinians,” released an animated Web video intended to raise consciousness about the difficulties facing Gazans who remain confined to the territory.

The Web video, “Closed Zone”, was made for a Web site, ClosedZone.com, that explains the difficulties of the blockade in English, Arabic and Hebrew. In a discussion of the making of the film posted on YouTube, Mr. Goodman said that his goal was to create a human figure “everyone can connect to,” so he came up with a character who is “a bit Arab and a bit Jewish.”



Gisha's website


The resort to animation is perhaps a sign, after so many years of television images showing the suffering of Israelis and Palestinians — like those who appear in The Guardian’s videos — that viewers in the region and in the rest of the world have perhaps lost some of their capacity to be shocked by those now-familiar scenes. Whether a short animated clip posted on the Web can really succeed in changing the way anyone sees the situation is an open question.