Saturday, July 11, 2009
Accessing Obama in Ghana
Saturday, February 21, 2009
US Multi-Media Campaign, On the Run
Wednesday, February 18, 2009
The US Congress: Tweeting competition
In the case of elections, Twitter is a quick way to permanently inform your readers about the incoming results. The Consulate of Israel in New York, for example, sent during the last elections through Twitter almost minute by minute updates.
See also:
AP - How the Twitter works
The Telegraph - The Twitter craze in the States
Friday, February 6, 2009
Irish politicians hopefuls following in Obama's blogging footsteps
Conor McHugh
February 4
Leinster Leader
Politics Online
ONE of the many impressive features of Barack Obama's astonishing electoral campaign was his use of the internet. He used it to bypass traditional media to deliver his various messages to people in their own homes and offices.
And he also used it to organise and keep an eye on his grassroots organisation.
On a much smaller scale three of Kildare's politicians are doing likewise – and it's perhaps interesting that, like Obama, the three in question are attempting to get elected to offices they don't currently hold.
Fine Gael's Tony O'Donnell and Richard Daly are contesting the forthcoming county council elections in the Kildare and Athy electoral areas, while Fianna Fail's James Lawless will be on the ballot paper for the council elections in the Naas electoral area.
Mr O'Donnell and Mr Lawless have been nominated for this year's Irish Blog Awards for their online presences. They've both been nominated in the category of Best Political Blog. The winners will be announced on February 21.
Both blogs have attracted nearly 11,000 visitors since they were started up.
Tony O'Donnell's blog is at http://drtod.wordpress.com and is full of articles and opinion pieces on all sorts of matters – mainly economic and politics, all fairly serious, or highbrow, reflecting Tony's experience as a computer engineer working for various multinationals, and his considerable interest in economics and politics and where the two often collide.
His is by far the best looking and best laid out of all three.
"Can
He's also good at spinning out the party line. For instance "A lot of good, solid, Fine Gael people have been whispering that FF deserve to stew for a few years in the mess they are currently making. This is the same logic that said that the last election was one to lose. I absolutely disagree. Fine Gael have never been a party of easy answers, which probably explains why we so rarely see office. Instead, we can be relied on to put the national interest first."
Meanwhile, Fianna Failer James Lawless, at http://www.jameslawless.ie/ concentrates on the bread and butter of FF politics. The first article visible talks about the approaching deadline for community grants.
Interestingly both James and Tony have similar academic backgrounds – both are Trinity graduates in, generally speaking the engineering/scientific side of academia – both are Trinity graduates in, generally speaking the engineering/scientific side of academia. They were both involved in politics while in college, both work in Dublin and are both involved in several local organisations – and take great pride in their involvement in the local GAA.
While Tony is happy to apply academic thinking to the problems of the world, James, who describes himself as a "Technical Architect with responsibility for enterprise class IT systems" makes a point of sticking to local issues – such as updates on Johnstown, the Sallins Local Area Plan, applying for grants, Naas swimming pool, Tallaght Hospital and schools.
Along the side of his blog he has listed the towns and villages of the Naas electoral area. Clicking on any of them will bring up a list of articles relating to that area.
"My politics remain green (in every sense) but like De Valera, I came to understand that ultimate freedom and is about good governance as much as borders and about enabling the people be the best they can be," is his pitch on himself – but he doesn't forget that the art of politics, especially Fianna Fail politics is to keep is as local as possible - "On a local level there are many issues where one can achieve immediate results to immediate betterment of one's community.
"I have worked on many of these in the past and will continue to do so into the future."
Richard Daly's site (http://www.rdaly.net/) is lively, colourful, if slightly chaotic. It features links to relevant people or organisations such as South Kildare FG or local Athy-based sites, as well as his blog that features his press releases.
The front page features pictures of Richard with various people such as Enda Kenny, Phil Hogan, the Sullivan Brothers, KFM's Noel Shannon and Minister Michael Martin.
There's also a video of a piece on TV3 where he held a class out in a field to highlight the continuing lack of a new school.
If anything, the site is more of a sorting station that directs the viewer to a variety of Richard Daly/FG/Athy connected sites.
While the younger political hopefuls embrace the web and its possibilities it will be interesting to see, come June, whether their presence there will have any effect on the outcome when the new council sits down to its first meeting later in the summer.
While Tony is happy to apply academic thinking to the p
Along the side of his blog he has listed the towns and villages of the Naas electoral area. Clicking on any of them will bring up a list of articles relating to that area.
“My politics remain green (in every sense) but like De Valera, I came to understand that ultimate freedom and is about good governance as much as borders and about enabling the people be the best they can be,” is his pitch on himself – but he doesn’t forget that the art of politics, especially Fianna Fail politics is to keep is as local as possible - “On a local level there are many issues where one can achieve immediate results to immediate betterment of one’s community.
“I have worked on many of these in the past and will continue to do so into the future.”
Richard Daly’s site (http://www.rdaly.net/) is lively, colourful, if slightly chaotic. It features links to relevant people or organisations such as South Kildare FG or local Athy-based sites, as well as his blog that features his press releases.
The front page features pictures of Richard with various people such as Enda Kenny, Phil Hogan, the Sullivan Brothers, KFM’s Noel Shannon and Minister Michael Martin.
There’s also a video of a piece on TV3 where he held a class out in a field to highlight the continuing lack of a new school.
If anything, the site is more of a sorting station that directs the viewer to a variety of Richard Daly/FG/Athy connected sites.
While the younger political hopefuls embrace the web and its possibilities it will be interesting to see, come June, whether their presence there will have any effect on the outcome when the new council sits down to its first meeting later in the summer..
When Friends Aren’t Really Friends
Caren Chesler
February 1
NANCY SHENKER wasn’t surprised when a local Westchester County politician asked to be her friend on Facebook. A marketing consultant for 20 years, she knows a lot of people. She consented, she says, because she liked his politics and liked him personally, that is, until he began poaching her Facebook friends — all 200 of them. Many said they received invitations to parties that turned out to be fund-raisers. Disgusted, Ms. Shenker de-friended the politician, a city councilman in a nearby town, whose name she declined to provide because she said she did not want to embarrass him.
“It would be like if I had a dinner party at my house, and he came in and started handing out campaign literature,” said Ms. Shenker, of Chappaqua.
But it didn’t end there. Ms. Shenker bumped into the politician at a party, and he asked her why she had de-friended him. When she explained why, he apologized and promised to stop. Satisfied, Ms. Shenker once again allowed him into her Facebook circle, until he began poaching again. She de-friended him once again, for good.
Politicians, from President Obama to small-town mayors, now use social networks like Facebook to expand their supporter base and communicate directly with people, especially Internet-savvy younger voters. Mr. Obama is credited with revolutionizing the strategy of using the Web to raise millions of dollars for campaigning.
But fund-raising on Facebook, a site many use for play — in some cases, intimate play — raises a question of etiquette in the world of virtual communication: When is it acceptable for politicians to call someone a friend, when they actually are looking for support, both financial and political? Politicians can set up a regular account on Facebook, just like any teenager with endless lists of so-called friends who have access to each other’s personal posted information, or they can register as a politician, and their contacts are referred to as supporters.
To list people as friends, when the Facebook user actually wants them as their supporters, is considered bad form by many users of Facebook, because they say it creates a sense of intimacy that may not really exist. Some politicians’ Facebook pages, while they purport to be personal, are actually monitored and run by staff members or volunteers.
As Ms. Shenker puts it, “Don’t pretend you want to hang out with someone and then hit him or her up for money.”
The phenomenon is no surprise, said Andrew Rasiej, founder of Personal Democracy Forum, which analyzes the use of technology by politicians. One page is authentic. The other reads like propaganda.
“The more authentic a candidate can appear to his supporters, the more credible his or her message,” Mr. Rasiej said.
New York State Assemblyman Greg Ball, whose district includes Westchester County, says he recently purchased several e-mail lists to draw people to his personal Facebook page, which he hopes to make one of the centerpieces in his campaign for Congress.
Councilman Peter Cammarano of Hoboken, N.J., uses his personal page to join Facebook groups like Hoboken Young Professionals or Hoboken Lawyers Alliance. Once in, he posts notes on the group’s bulletin board alerting members to fund-raisers. He says it’s far more productive to find potential supporters that way than standing outside a ShopRite handing out fliers, where he does not know if the people he approaches even live in Hoboken.
Supporters like being considered friends, both online and off. Making them feel important can foster the relationship, said Richard Zeoli, who is running for freeholder in Sussex County, N.J.
“Look at the private dinner the new chief of staff hosted for the high-level donors and the V.I.P. access they received during the inauguration,” Mr. Zeoli said.
But the technology is developing faster than the rules of etiquette. Most political operations know it’s not O.K. to phone people during dinner, but the rules for online engagement are yet to be established, said Scott Shields, a political consultant with White Horse Strategies L.L.C. in Rockaway, N.J. “Still, when you hear about things like what that Westchester politician did, it sets off alarm bells in people’s minds. It’s not something that would pass most people’s smell test,” Mr. Shields said.
Of course, by drawing people to their personal Facebook pages, politicians are essentially invading their own privacy. They are limited in what they can post and must carefully screen their friends, knocking out those who post risqué photos or lewd messages.
Bill Finch, the mayor of Bridgeport, Conn., said he was amazed at what people will say online. As a state senator, he had a Web site and was forced to shut down its blog because the discussions turned nasty, he said.
“I don’t know if there are a lot of mental issues out there, but there are a lot of angry people who don’t know how to behave themselves,” Mr. Finch said.
But politicians with personal pages on Facebook risk revealing too much, sometimes to their opponents. When Craig M. Johnson, an incumbent Democratic state senator from Long Island, ran for re-election in November, he was promised the Independence Party’s line, an advantage because it meant his name would appear twice on the ballot. To his surprise, a registered member of the Independence Party began circulating petitions seeking the ballot line herself. The senator’s staff looked at the Independence candidate’s Facebook page and saw she counted among her friends the son of Mr. Johnson’s Republican opponent, an indication his rival was behind the woman’s candidacy, Mr. Johnson said. In the end, the woman declined the nomination, and through a series of political machinations, the Republican candidate received the Independence line.
“It was clearly a political play to get the party line,” Mr. Johnson said.
But politicians using personal pages for outreach — particularly those already in office — may create disappointment if constituents mistakenly believe they have direct contact with their representative, and their correspondence goes unanswered.
Staff members for Gov. Deval Patrick of Massachusetts had just that concern when they set up a Web site for the governor, according to Christine Williams, a political science professor at Bentley University in Waltham, Mass. But Dr. Williams, who interviewed members of the governor’s staff for a research paper, said the site’s benefits outweighed that fear when a constituent posted a comment criticizing a town pedestrian walk sign, and the poster’s local alderman went on the site and responded. The two met to try to resolve the issue.
But perhaps it is the politicians who are realizing there is a difference between real friends and supporters. Dr. Williams said that in the 2008 presidential primary, when a candidate withdrew from or lost a race, a significant number of people went online and rescinded their support.
“De-friending, on personal Facebook pages, is not that common because of the embarrassment and anger it might generate,” she said. “But people do de-support political candidates.”
Thursday, February 5, 2009
Obama losing the stimulus message war
Jeanne Cummings
POLITICO
At this crucial juncture in the push to pass an economic recovery package, President Obama finds himself in the most unlikely of places: He is losing the message war.
Despite Obama’s sky high personal approval ratings, polls show support has declined for his stimulus bill since Republicans and their conservative talk-radio allies began railing against what they labeled as pork barrel spending within it.
The sheer size of it – hovering at about $900 billion — has prompted more protests that are now causing some moderate and conservative Democrats to flinch and, worse, hesitate.
The anxiety over lost momentum seemed almost palpable this week as the president in television interviews voiced frustration with his White House’s progress and the way his recovery program was being demonized as a Democratic spending frenzy.
In Obama’s own words in an NBC interview, it’s his job to “get this thing back on track.”
Already, he’s trying – rolling out Michelle Obama to talk stimulus Wednesday, Vice President Joe Biden on Thursday (at a train station, no less) and sitting down with key senators one-on-one.
But this is unfamiliar turf for a team that achieved near epic status for its communication skills during the presidential campaign. They’ve rarely ever had to play catch-up.
With the president’s gifted oratory and a technologically savvy team, the Obama camp was able to seize control of the national conversation as early as April and never fully relinquish it right through his Inaugural Address two weeks ago.
To be sure, some of Obama’s headaches stem from the normal dysfunction that occurs when a White House is in transition. Phones don’t work, chains of command are fuzzy, and there are formalities that need tending to.
But the Obama team also made its own mistakes. The president’s troubled cabinet nominees added to the cacophony that at times drowned out the White House economic messages in the past two weeks.
And it seems more apparent each day that the nascent Obama Administration isn’t fully prepared for the task at hand.
The president’s decision to push through a massive stimulus bill, while perhaps unavoidable, is forcing the much-vaunted Chicago crowd to adapt at lightning speed to its more skillful adversaries on Capitol Hill, while at the same time taking a crash course on harnessing the full power of bully pulpit. If he doesn’t figure it out soon, Obama is likely to find out that his stimulus package looks very different than he had in mind indeed.
The Jetsons versus the Flinstones
Obama’s campaign was lauded for its visionary use of modern tools for old-fashioned politics. Through the Internet, it recruited supporters, collected dollars, rallied supporters and organized get-out-the vote operations.
But when these modern heroes arrived at the White House, it was like the lights all went out.
Their contact with their millions-fold supporters was cut off, literally, as e-mail systems broke down and ‘The List’ of political supporters was blocked at the iron gate.
To meet government ethics rules, the campaign operation and its grassroots army were forced to de-camp to the Democratic National Committee, robbing the president of one of his most potent political weapons just as the stimulus bill was under consideration in the House.
But while the White House team struggled to adapt, it was business as usual on Capitol Hill for Republicans.
They could practically sleep-walk through their attack plan once House Democrats began to fill in Obama’s broad outlines for a stimulus with a few pet projects of their own.
It required two simple steps: Scream pork, call Rush Limbaugh.
They even could have even used a rotary phone.
The result: Every House Republican saw a free pass and voted against the first version of the bill.
The outcome is not surprising. Obama had roughly 90 people working at his headquarters on Internet outreach and new technology projects, observes Joe Trippi, a Democratic operative who broke new ground on modern campaigning during Howard Dean’s 2004 Democratic primary bid.
Even with closet-sized spaces, the White House can only accommodate about only about 200 or so people for jobs ranging from national security to health care reform to Internet guru.
The Obama team “built this incredible campaign and now they have these ridiculously primitive tools. The communication tools they mastered don’t exist in the White House. It’s like they are in a cave,” said Trippi.
“Then there are the masters of the Stone Age and they are doing a good job,” he added.
Learning to play well with others
During the campaign, Obama had complete control over his message. Now, he doesn’t and that’s not an easy adjustment for any president.
Obama must suddenly yield turf to both Capitol Hill and outside interest groups who are trying to help. The results in both cases can be messy.
Obama’s decision to provide broad guidelines for the stimulus -- “targeted, timely and temporary” -- rather than issuing specific legislation, was done in deference to Hill lawmakers, especially the Democratic leaders that lord over the legislative branch.
But it’s hardly a secret that the president found unhelpful the House Democrats’ decision to slip funding for special groups into its version of his stimulus bill.
Funding to allow Medicaid programs to provide contraceptives as part of its family planning services to low income recipients was the Republicans’ first easy mark for attacking the legislation.
“How you can spend hundreds of millions of dollars on contraceptives -- how does that stimulate the economy?” House Minority Leader John Boehner asked.
With a phone call from the White House, Obama had that provision stripped from the legislation but the damage was done and Republicans soon moved to the next so-called pork project to launch a new attack.
Senate Democrats have vowed to strip those measures from the bill. But now moderate senators, including some Democrats, uneasy with the size of the package are considering trimming one of Obama’s top priorities: providing seed money for doctors and hospitals to begin computerizing patient records, a first step in broader reforms he plans to offer on health care.
Similar disconnects are evident in the public campaign for the legislation.
A host of unions and liberal advocacy groups have stepped up to try to help Obama move the legislation through Congress. Their intentions are all good, but it’s an untested alliance given the Obama’s decision to shun such independent support in the campaign. The effort also lacks the dramatic punch -- and deep pockets -- that became the signature of his campaign.
According to Evan Tracey, president of Campaign Media Analysis Group, about $65,000 has been spent on pro-stimulus ads in a handful of states.
In the last week of the presidential campaign, Obama was spending an average of $250,000 a day on commercials in the Philadelphia market, alone.
The pro-stimulus television ads aired by the outside coalitions echo Obama’s message about helping working families survive the worst economic conditions since World War II.
But the legally required lack of coordination between the White House and it’s newest allies has led to other inefficiencies.
Among the targets of the television ad campaign was New Hampshire Republican Sen. Judd Gregg. Just days later, Obama nominated Gregg to become his new Commerce Secretary.
More discordant, however, was the impact of a radio ad by Americans United for Change.
“Are you with Rush or with Obama?” the commentator asked.
The commercial ran in only three states, but it wound up capturing national headlines, elevating a mere radio talk show host to presidential status and sending the White House efforts to recruit moderate Republican support wildly off message.
Owning the bully pulpit
During the presidential campaign, Obama’s team used big events to elevate the candidate’s big ideas or respond to emerging, divisive issues. Remember Philadelphia and the big speech on race relations?
That’s not so easy to do in the White House, which thrives on its own rhythms and traditions.
Obama has certainly tried to exploit those opportunities, offering radio addresses and using what seem to be such routine administration events as announcing a new cabinet pick to pitch the recovery package.
In addition, he has fallen back on the time honored White House photo-op/meet-and-greet to drive the news of the day.
But the Obama team hasn’t mastered the less-is-more formula that isolates a presidential appearance for maximum impact.
Simply put, the way to exploit a White House moment is not to compete with it.
That kind of PR self control can drive the coverage from the relentless and omnipresent cable outlets back -- again and again -- to that singular event.
But the new White House sometimes runs over its own, central economic message.
For instance, Obama hosted at the White House nearly a dozen corporate executives who support his recovery package on the same day the House passed its version of the legislation on a party line vote.
As a consequence, the support for the legislation from a host of cutting edge technology CEOs was buried amid coverage of the lack of a single House Republican vote in favor of it.
On Monday the White House tried again.
Obama had sought to illustrate the support he has among governors for the stimulus package by inviting Republican Vermont Gov. Jim Douglas for remarks.
But that news was quickly overtaken by Secretary of State Hillary Clinton’s swearing in ceremony.
Indeed, the Obama team has yet to fully exploit the open and enthusiastic support it has received from such higher profile Republican governors as Gov. Charlie Crist of Florida and Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger of California for his stimulus program.
Eric Eikenberg, Crist’s chief of staff, said in an interview this week that his boss is hoping federal aid can help the Sunshine State avoid significant layoffs and that the governor is burning the phone lines to turn Republican opposition on Capitol Hill into support.
“This can help Florida,” Eikenberg said.
But when White House Spokesman Robert Gibbs had a chance to highlight that support on Wednesday, he referred reporters to television interviews of Crist on cable networks rather than an Oval Office moment.
To make matter worse, the White House’s failure to space out events took another toll on its economic public relations campaign.
Just hours after Obama issued new rules on corporate compensation aimed at renewing public support for his recovery package, he signed a major bill expanding health care for children.
“To me, each one of those is a stand alone event,” said Tad Devine, a Democratic political consultant. “There is a risk of overwhelming things.”
When the campaign is over, the tasks and the challenges are different. In addition, you need results. Obama is roughly a month in office. No wonder he still need to get the full control over the White House and his own new schedule for the next four years. The dangers of an almost perfect PR electoral campaign is to rise high expectations, diluted after - and quite easy - in an ocean of despair. I'm very very curious how his working communications campaign will look like.