Showing posts with label Kyrgyzstan. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Kyrgyzstan. Show all posts

Friday, December 31, 2010

Deciphering Kyrgyzstan



Kyrgyzstan, a country that we, in the West, hardly identify on the map, is not only a mystery, but a place – as many in the world – where you could read the Cold War, the latest impact of globalization and the geopolitical reassessments. More than Belarus, it is a benchmark in the regional configuration, given its potential and the crossings of various interests.

Since December 2001, it was opened here a base – Manas Air Base, currently the Transit Center at Manas - to support U.S. military operations in the ongoing war in Afghanistan. As in the case of other countries from the former Soviet empire, as Uzbekistan and Kazakhstan, the US and international presence in general, was considered an important assets in getting more money and recognition – despite the poor record in the area of corruption, democracy and human rights. But, for small countries, it is almost impossible to play alone. Russia and China have been pushing often for the closure of the base and the local Parliament voted in December 2009 in favor of such a move. The base will continue to be hosted until 2014.

When it is not in the cards of the big power-brokers, Kyrgyzstan is trying, not always successful to build its own path. And we will hear again in the news about the country when there are violent coups – as it was this April, when the former president Kumanbek Bakiyev was removed from power and fled to Belarus. The country is facing economic problems, but also an ethnic conflict in the South, with the Uzbeks, where during the last summer there were registered several clashes, leading to the death of hundreds and displacement of thousands. But in a country where you don’t have free media and full democracy, it is difficult to estimate the situation.

In the last years, people went out in the street fighting for reform – as it was the case in 2006, where the current prime-minister Almazbek Atambayev participated to the protests of the movement За Реформы (For Reform). But it is hard to understand from the first sight why the reform couldn’t be accomplished. The latest parliamentary elections leaded to the creation of a coalition of opposition parties, who could play a big role in promoting democracy, given the increased powers of the Parliament since this summer.

As in the case of other ex Soviet members – as Moldova – the first trip overseas of the new prime minister was in Moscow, for meeting Vladimir Putin and got back the promise of more investments and loans. On the other hand, the West is trying to do its best, with fewer financial resources in comparison with the beginning of 1990s, for helping the country, but after more than 20 years of experience in the transitional processes in the former communist countries, not too many wonders to be expected.

The tensed relations with the neighbors – Belarus is hosting the former president, Uzbekistan just raised the natural-gas price, despite the Kyrgyz promise for a nomination of the president of Uzbekistan, Islam Karimov, for the Nobel Peace Prize - are increasing the level of dependency of the country of Russia. But what it is the advantage for Russia to keep all those “satellites”, apart the illusion of the glorious “old good times” of the Soviet Union?


Enhanced by Zemanta

Friday, July 31, 2009

Kyrgyz presidential election failed to meet key OSCE commitments, despite some positive elements

OSCE Press Release
BISHKEK, 24 July - Kyrgyzstan's presidential election failed to meet key OSCE commitments, despite some positive elements, the OSCE election observation mission concluded in a preliminary statement released today."We are pleased to see some political pluralism and an active civil society, but this was undermined by an overall uneven playing field in which the distinction between the ruling party and the State was blurred," said Senator Consiglio Di Nino, Special Co-ordinator of the OSCE short-term observers and Head of the delegation of the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly."Sadly, this election did not show the progress we were hoping for and it again fell short of key standards Kyrgyzstan has committed to as a participating State of the OSCE. The conduct of election day was a disappointment. We hope that our assessment and recommendations will be used constructively as a basis for a serious overhaul of the way elections are organized in Kyrgyzstan in the future," said Radmila Sekerinska, the Head of the election observation mission of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights (ODIHR).
Voters could choose from a number of presidential candidates and civil society played an important role in the election process. But observers also stressed that the incumbent gained an unfair advantage over his opponents through the misuse of administrative resources and bias in the media coverage of the campaign, which did not allow voters to make an informed choice.The observers noted instances of obstruction of opposition campaign events as well as pressure and intimidation of opposition supporters. The shortcomings observed contributed to an atmosphere of distrust and undermined public confidence in holding genuinely democratic elections.Election day was marred by many problems and irregularities, including ballot box stuffing, inaccuracies in the voter lists, and multiple voting. The process further deteriorated during the vote count and the tabulation of results, with observers evaluating this part of the process negatively in more than half of observations.The OSCE election observation mission is a joint undertaking of the OSCE Office for Democratic Institutions and Human Rights and the OSCE Parliamentary Assembly.
See also:
The Economist - Tulips Squashed

Tuesday, February 10, 2009

Central Asia's Great Water Game




Farangis Najibullah
Radio Free Europe/Radio Liberty
February 4


Apples are a valuable source of income for Khadija and her family in summer, but desperate times call for desperate measures.


With a severe shortage of energy supplies affecting all aspects of life this winter, she has decided the family orchard is best suited to provide firewood for the cooking stove that now serves as a main heating source.

"We are left in such misery. I cut branches of trees to burn in the stove. I wish prices were cheaper, at least," Khadija says.

With no supplies of natural gas and electricity usage restricted to one hour, prices for coal and firewood have skyrocketed, leaving Khadija and her fellow villagers in eastern Tajikistan's Rasht Valley with few options.

Variations of the theme can be told in much of Central Asia, where electricity shortages deprive millions of the luxuries -- and necessities -- that much of the world takes for granted.

But for mountainous Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan, the solution is clear -- water.


Regional Meeting



It is with that in mind that the presidents of the two states headed to Moscow for summits of the Collective Security Treaty Organization (CSTO) and the Eurasian Economic Community (Eurasec) on February 4.

But the trip to the Russian capital also promises to highlight the sharp divisions that water and electricity issues have exposed -- particularly following recent comments by the Russian president.

Tajik officials blame Uzbekistan for their energy crisis, saying the neighboring country impeded the supply of imported Turkmen electricity that travels long power lines that run across Uzbek territory.
At the end of the day, it is up to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan themselves to find a consensus


Seeking to take advantage of ample water supplies and mountainous terrain, Tajikistan hopes to complete construction of its Roghun hydropower plant and become an electricity exporter.

Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiev was in Moscow already on February 2 for a long-awaited face-to-face meeting with Medvedev, and walked away with promises of funding that could help complete the country's Kambarata hydropower plant.

And beneath the surface, Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan both fear that Medvedev is siding with Uzbekistan, whose downstream position has led it to oppose Dushanbe's and Bishkek's hydropower ambitions on the basis that it would be left without water.

Medvedev's comments during an official visit to Tashkent on January 22-23 -- in which he said that any hydroelectric power stations in the region should only be constructed after taking into account the concerns of all neighboring states -- sounded alarms in Tajikistan and Kyrgyzstan.


The Russia Factor



Tajik authorities reacted most sharply, vowing to go ahead with its hydropower projects despite all objections. And while Tajik President Emomali Rahmon in the end traveled to Moscow to attend the two summits, planned meetings with his Russian counterpart were cancelled.


Aleksei Malashenko, an expert at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace in Moscow, says that while the dispute indicates Russia seeks to play an important mediating role in Central Asia, it actually "is demonstrating its inability to do so."

"Moscow is not capable of concretely formulating its position so that the two interested parties accepted it," Malashenko says.

"In my opinion, Tajikistan and Uzbekistan -- understanding that they cannot live without each other despite their differences -- would try to find new mediators that would act in new conditions. If it happens, it would be a step toward weakening Moscow's position in the region."

Andrei Grozyn, a Moscow-based expert on political issues, says Moscow's latest position forces Tajikistan to diversify its foreign policy instead of counting on Moscow as its major and most important strategic partner.

Grozyn says that, at the end of the day, it is up to Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan themselves to find a consensus -- "instead of telling Moscow 'choose me over my neighbor.'"

"Both Tashkent and Dushanbe in different ways but with the same persistence tell Moscow 'support only me.' It is not what Russia wants because in that case if Russia constructs Roghun, it would have to cancel other projects, including gas deals in Uzbekistan," Grozyn says. "And if it completely focuses on Uzbekistan, it would have to forget about all its economic interests in Tajikistan."

It is unlikely that Uzbekistan, Tajikistan, and Kyrgyzstan will resolve their water issues in Moscow this week.

Until the countries' leaders do find a common language, it will be ordinary people like Khadija and her children that pay the price.

As Khadija's teenage daughter, Gulandom, says: "These days you can't count on your government or on anyone else. You've got to find a solution to your own problems."

Friday, February 6, 2009

Kyrgyzstan's Decision to Close US Base 'Final'

Voice of America




U.S. soldiers open the gates of a military base, which is located within Manas civilian airport, near Kyrgyzstan's capital Bishkek, 04 Feb 2009
U.S. soldiers open the gates of a military base, which is located within Manas civilian airport, near Kyrgyzstan's capital Bishkek, 04 Feb 2009

Kyrgyzstan says its decision to shut down a U.S. military base is "final."

That word from a Kyrgyz government spokesman on Friday contradicts earlier statements from both Kyrgyzstan and the United States that discussions about the base are continuing.

A U.S. State Department spokesman, Gordon Duguid, reiterated that there has been no official notification from Kyrgyzstan on the status of the base. He said Friday that normal operations continue at the base, along with talks with Kyrgyz authorities on the U.S. presence.

The Manas air base in Kyrgyzstan plays a major logistical role in supplying U.S. and NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Kyrgyz President Kurmanbek Bakiyev announced plans to shut the base on Tuesday in Moscow, shortly after securing $2 billion in loans and aid from Russia.

Meanwhile, Russian Foreign Minister Sergei Lavrov says his country will allow the United States to cross Russian territory to deliver non-military supplies to Afghanistan.

Tajkistan is also offering help. The U.S. ambassador in Dushanbe, Tracey Ann Jacobson, says the Tajik president is ready to allow transport of non-military supplies to Afghanistan through his territory.

Diplomatic and defense sources say the United States is considering a military deal with Uzbekistan to establish an alternate supply route for NATO forces fighting the Taliban in Afghanistan.

Most U.S. and NATO shipments into Afghanistan have been arriving by road through Pakistan, but those convoys have increasingly come under attack from Taliban and al-Qaida militants in recent months.

The Kyrgyzstan base issue flared as the Obama administration continued a policy review on the Afghanistan conflict that is widely expected to include a big increase in U.S. troop strength there.

U.S. Secretary of State Hillary Clinton said Thursday that denial of access to Manas would be regrettable but would not affect U.S. Afghan strategy.


See also:


Jamestown Foundation - Kazahstan Rising its Afghanistan Profile


The Wall Street Journal - The aide for Afghanistan, addressed at the Munich Conference